PA ANALYSIS: Should IFAs and fund supermarkets fear the price war?

Added 25th May 2016

The investment industry has seen an unusual flurry of fee cuts, transparency improvements and new launches recently but is this all for the better or a reason to worry for some?

PA ANALYSIS: Should IFAs and fund supermarkets fear the price war?

The week kicked off with M&G Investments launching its own direct to consumer online service. Central to the proposition is a significant fee cut of 50bps on the average M&G equities fund and 25bps on the average bond fund.

Then today we saw passive investment juggernaut Vanguard making a bold move into the active fund arena with offerings at 60bps, something that will no doubt concern the established players in the UK market.

Hot on the heels of the Vanguard news it was announced that ratings and research house RSMR is to launch its own investment platform giving investors access to its burgeoning range of model portfolios at an aggressive fee level of 25bps.

This all follows moves by the likes of Neil Woodford to offer more transparency on how fees are drawn up and absorb some elements which have traditionally been passed on to the end investors, like external research costs.

It would be seriously stretching the powers of coincidence to think the timing of all these different things is purely chance. There are clearly forces at work which could change the investment industry for the better or worse, depending on your perspective and what happens from here.

A fundamental factor underlying all this is that competition is increasing both in the passives space where FTSE 100 trackers have been squeezed down to fees of 7bps, and in active management.

The push for transparency on fees in the post RDR era is hitting home more than ever, leaving providers with less and less scope to obfuscate exactly what their offerings cost the end investor in comparison with other firms. Retail investors are gradually becoming more savvy and price conscious to boot.    

The increasingly bold regulator is another key aspect underpinning these moves. Relationships between product providers and financial advisers are under a new level of scrutiny from the FCA, with things like client entertainment drawing disapproving comment.

If providers are no longer free to build such cosy relationships with advisers, it logically makes going direct to consumers more important. One consequence for this could be a big increase in restricted advisers being unleashed by providers, meaning the independents have fewer potential clients themselves.

Kames Income Hub


Vincent McEntegart, manager of the Kames Diversified Monthly Income Fund, explains how he aims to deliver a stable and sustainable income of 5% p.a.*, paid monthly, by investing in a range of asset classes

Square Mile Research

Matthews Asia Funds Asia Dividend
Matthews Asia Funds Asia Dividend...

Talking Factsheets is a video service for users...

Visitor's Comments Add your comment

Add Your Comment

We won't publish your address

About Author

Alex Sebastian

News editor

Alex joined Portfolio Adviser in April 2014 and has been a financial journalist since 2008. He has previously held editorial positions at the Financial Times Group and Euromoney Institutional Investor. Alex is NCTJ qualified and has a degree in economics from the University of Sussex.



Investment Strategy




PA Channel Island 2016
PA Channel Island 2016

8th November 2016
The Royal Yacht, Jersey


17th November 2016
The Andaz

PA Emerging Markets 2016
PA Emerging Markets 2016

1st December 2016
The Mayfair, London

Sponsored Content

Investment Strategy