Adjusted earnings measures becoming “increasingly misleading”

Added 11th May 2016

Companies are employing a growing number of ‘innovative’ accounting measures and, as a result accounts are becoming increasingly misleading, the chairman of the International Accounting Standards Board has said.

Adjusted earnings measures becoming “increasingly misleading”

In a speech to the Annual Conference of European Accounting Association on Wednesday, Hans Hoogevorst said, not only is there a growing disconnect between actual and adjusted earnings numbers, which is worrying in light of the fact that companies tend to base management remuneration packages on these adjusted earnings.

“More than 88% of the S&P 500 currently disclose non-GAAP metrics in their earnings release. Of those releases, 82% show increased net income and are clearly designed to present results in a more favourable light,” Hoogevorst said.

According to one study, he added, so-called ‘core earnings’ were on average 30% higher than the Generally Accepted Accounting Practice earnings metric. While acknowledging that the numbers cited are for the American market, he added that securities regulators making use of international financial reporting standards are also concerned that “non-GAAP numbers are getting increasingly detached from reality”.

Hoogevorst admitted that the board of IFRS has to look at its own role in this issue and said there are a number of remedies that might be considered, including, among other things defining more subtotals within the income statement and providing more rigorous definitions of performance metrics above the bottom line

But, he added: “Knowing that even GAAP numbers can be vulnerable to earnings management, remuneration committees should be extremely wary to base their policies on earnings adjusted by management itself!”

Citing a recent example where a CEO’s remuneration was increased despite the company suffering a hefty loss as a result of his remuneration being based on non-GAAP measures “that almost completely insulated his income from factors that are considered to be outside the control of management”, Hoogevorst said:

“The irony of this case is that the company’s shareholders had previously approved the remuneration policy, apparently without anticipating what the consequences could be. Clearly, both shareholders and remuneration committees need to be much more aware and critical of the role of non-GAAP measures in remuneration formulas.”

Kames Income Hub


Vincent McEntegart, manager of the Kames Diversified Monthly Income Fund, explains how he aims to deliver a stable and sustainable income of 5% p.a.*, paid monthly, by investing in a range of asset classes

Square Mile Research

Lazard Emerging Markets
Lazard Emerging Markets

Talking Factsheets is a video service for users...

Visitor's Comments Add your comment

Add Your Comment

We won't publish your address

About Author

Geoff Candy

Group digital editor

Geoff Candy joined Portfolio Adviser as News Editor in May 2014. He has been a financial journalist and broadcaster since 2005 and, in that time has worked in both South Africa and the Netherlands, covering everything from high street retailers and construction companies to mining and insurance.



Investment Strategy




PA Channel Island 2016
PA Channel Island 2016

8th November 2016
The Royal Yacht, Jersey


17th November 2016
The Andaz

PA Emerging Markets 2016
PA Emerging Markets 2016

1st December 2016
The Mayfair, London

Sponsored Content

Investment Strategy