bulletRELATED ARTICLES

 

bulletEDITOR'S PICKS

 

PA ANALYSIS: Like equities EMD bandwagoners have plenty to prove

From PA ANALYSIS May 3 2012 @ 16:25

There's no denying the buzz there has been around emerging market debt (EMD) recently, but like...
view article

Schroders beefs up its EMD team

From People Moves May 2 2012 @ 16:27

Schroders has become the latest fund house to intensify its focus on what is being viewed as one...
view article


bulletRDR beneficiaries

 

Who will reap the greatest financial gains from RDR?



A United Kingdom will outlast a single Europe

From Economics Jan 3 2012 BY: Gary Corcoran , Group Editor , Portfolio Adviser and International Adviser

Add to My News Comments (0)

Print

Add to My News


Relations between Britain and Europe have rarely been good. Over the past five hundred years, disputes have been almost continuous. Sometimes, the conflict’s been military; mostly, it’s been philosophical.

The basic problem has been the mainlanders’ predisposition to totalitarianism, the islanders’ to individualism.

Initially, religion was the central issue:  Catholic authority colliding with protestant conscience.  Subsequently, politics aggravated the divide:  an autocratic Louis XIV contending with a constitutional William III; a tyrannous Napoleon with a liberal Pitt; a fascist Hitler with a democratic Churchill.

Each time, Britain found itself in the minority.  The European majority chose, shamelessly, not to get involved.  It preferred expediency to principle.  In doing so, the mainland demonstrated an almost unblemished capacity for getting things wrong; the island, an almost equally impressive one for getting them right.

The current spat with the EU should be seen in this context.  The majority of member states had chosen, banally, to lumber themselves with an unworkable common currency.  Britain, in a tiny minority, wisely, refused to do so.  Predictably, the system collapsed; and, predictably also, those who’d embroiled themselves in it most enthusiastically vented their fury most vituperatively on those who hadn’t.

The parallels with 1940 are stark.  France is beside herself with petulant rage, envious of Germany’s economic competence and of Britain’s economic insight.

Britain, seventy years ago, wasn’t wholly united; nor is it today.  Cameron is unreliable; a latter-day Chamberlain.  He has only reluctantly drawn a line in the sand.  He’d prefer to compromise, to sacrifice another Sudetenland.  He’s being encouraged in this regard by comparably unreliable colleagues.  Clarke is Lord Halifax; Clegg, Lord Haw-Haw.

What is needed is a general election; alternatively, a referendum.  Let the people decide whether to live under European authoritarianism or Anglo-Saxon tolerance.  Don’t let mendacious politicians fudge the issue any longer.

Add to My News Comments (0)

Add to My News Print

Add to My News

add to twitter

add to linkedin



COMMENTS


Have your say

(Be the first to) Have your say!

Please sign in or register here to leave a comment. Registration is free and only takes a few moments.





Follow us on Twitter

FOLLOW US ON TWITTER
Get the latest news

Share on Linked In

SHARE ON LINKED IN
Inform your colleagues

Switch to our mobile site

SWITCH TO MOBILE SITE
News on the go

Back tot he top of the page

BACK TO TOP OF PAGE
Just click here...