PA ANALYSIS: Sorting through the winners and losers post-Dodd Frank

Added 9th February 2017

The dismantling of Dodd-Frank will give European banks with ties to the United States a competitive advantage and could influence other nations to adopt a more competitive regulatory scheme.

“If Trump allows the US financial institutions to become all-singing, all-dancing and return to the classic retail/investment bank set-up, Chinese banks might see that as a bit of a threat and accelerate the liberalisation of their own regulation so they can compete in terms of product offering,” said Bailey.

However, financial institutions in, say, Singapore might stick to their guns of “regulatory prudence and toughness,” billing themselves as anti-deregulation and anti-US in their approach, he added.

Like Trump’s plans to drastically cut corporation tax, Schroders UK equities man David Docherty argues looser financial regulation would encourage lending.

"President Trump will govern as a transactional, ‘CEO-president’, reducing predictability and increasing idiosyncratic risks for investors,” said Docherty. “He appears to have a Reaganesque belief in deregulation, tax cuts and government efficiency, yet a New Deal enthusiasm for infrastructure projects and an LBJ-like commitment to social security and workers’ rights. However, he will not be immune to the normal constraints of congressional votes, time and money in furthering his legislative programme.

“Repeal of the Dodd-Frank framework of financial regulation is unlikely any time soon given other priorities, but a relaxation of regulation and enforcement is highly likely and would encourage greater lending activity. On this basis, generally low valuations should provide a favourable basis for continued outperformance despite the sector’s recent rally.”

However, the fact that the merits of regulation versus deregulation is up for debate is interesting from a psychological perspective, said Bailey. It proves that “practitioners, politicians and people in finance have very short-term memories.”

“There is always this waxing or waning from a regulatory perspective. Now that profitability and returns on equities have improved, people are no longer as worried as they were even just a few years ago. We have come full circle.”

Still, “a little prudence is probably wise,” he cautioned. “The issues and challenges of 2007 are not fully over. Governments wouldn’t own half the bond market if they were.”

Sponsors

Portfolio Adviser: Guide to Europe

Portfolio Adviser: Guide to Europe

After a politically turbulent time in 2016, Europe has been under scrutiny with several nations going to the polls.The question asked, would investors be right to...

Kames Income Hub

home_research_centre

Vincent McEntegart, manager of the Kames Diversified Monthly Income Fund, explains how he aims to deliver a stable and sustainable income of 5% p.a.*, paid monthly, by investing in a range of asset classes

Square Mile Research

AXA Distribution Fund
AXA Distribution Fund

Talking Factsheets is a video service for users...

Visitor's Comments Add your comment

Add Your Comment

We won't publish your address

Profiles

Viewpoint

Investment Strategy

Feature

Tweets

Events

PA Income 2017
PA Income 2017

Tuesday 4 July
Radisson Blu Edwardian Bloomsbury Street Hotel 

PA Edinburgh 2017
PA Edinburgh 2017

Thursday 7 September
Balmoral Hotel

PA Alternatives 2017
PA Alternatives 2017

Tuesday 12 September
Radisson Blu Edwardian Bloomsbury Street Hotel

PA Dublin October 2017
PA Dublin October 2017

Tuesday 10 October
Westbury Hotel, Dublin

Sponsored Content

OTHER STORIES FROM LAST WORD...